Selasa, 26 Januari 2010

plus 3, Why Are Homeowners Idiots? - Motley Fool

plus 3, Why Are Homeowners Idiots? - Motley Fool


Why Are Homeowners Idiots? - Motley Fool

Posted: 26 Jan 2010 10:33 AM PST

Recs

56

Across the country, many homeowners have faced the devastating realization that the homes they own are now worth less than what they owe the bank. We all know this unenviable situation as being "underwater."

The pervasiveness of underwater homeowners is already fairly well known, particularly when it comes to hard-hit areas like Arizona, Nevada, Florida, and California. What is not particularly well known, though, is exactly why most of these battered borrowers are still making good on their monthly payments.

Why don't they walk away?
An interesting quirk of economics is that the dismal science generally assumes that all agents in an economy work in their own best interest. But this doesn't always happen in real life.

The mortgage crisis is a case in point. For many of the underwater homeowners in today's market, paying down their mortgage isn't really in their best financial interest. Particularly in states like Arizona -- where mortgages are nonrecourse, meaning the lender can't go after any of the homeowner's assets other than the property itself -- it makes little sense to continue paying a large mortgage on a devalued house when comparable rental rates are far below the monthly mortgage payment.

The situation had University of Arizona economist Brent White scratching his head, and as a result he wrote a very interesting paper on the subject, which University of Chicago luminary Richard Thaler brought to an even broader audience over the weekend.

Come on, everybody's doing it
Among the conclusions White reached is that borrowers are suffering from "norm asymmetry." That's a jargony term for sure, but it basically means that homeowners are being convinced that the "right thing to do" is to keep paying their mortgage -- even if it's not in their best interest. That stands in stark contrast to the financial giants that make these mortgages, which are free to do whatever they need to in order to maximize profits -- and bonuses.

And who's doing this convincing? For a large part it's the financial companies themselves, folks like Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), Citigroup (NYSE: C), JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC).

But they're not alone. They've had plenty of help from government officials like Hank Paulson. Back in 2008, Paulson launched a sharp jab against those who would consider walking away from their homes, saying:

And let me emphasize, any homeowner who can afford his mortgage payment but chooses to walk away from an underwater property is simply a speculator -- and one who is not honoring his obligations.

Which makes perfect sense, since I imagine Paulson never speculated on anything when he was at the helm of trading king Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS). And, of course, with de facto ownership of the ill-fated Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), the government doesn't stand to gain anything at all from persuading homeowners to act against their own best interest.

During the implosion of the housing market, the government has helped massive financial firms and many homeowners who bought houses they never should have qualified to buy in the first place. Meanwhile, responsible borrowers who bought houses they could afford on traditional fixed-rate loans are made to feel as if they are morally bankrupting themselves if they decide to do what is often highly financially advisable.

Why do we have this "norm asymmetry"? Why would we heap guilt onto this particular group? My guess is that if the powers that be answered honestly, that answer would be "because we can."

Thanks to folks like Brent White, Richard Thaler, and homeowners who are already choosing to move against the grain, though, the stigma of walking away from a severely devalued asset may be waning. If this is the case, the big banks and Uncle Sam need to put away the wagging finger and instead actually deal with the situation in a reasonable and sound manner. I'd suggest a confab with White and Thaler as a good first step.

Underwater homeowners have been getting some rotten advice, but they're not the only ones. Check out this terrible advice you should ignore.

Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction.



image

Research and Markets: The Battery Technical Manual Contains the Most ... - PR Inside

Posted: 26 Jan 2010 09:00 AM PST

2010-01-26 17:59:03 -

Research and Markets( www.researchandmarkets.com/research/9add3d/bci_battery_techni : ) has announced the addition of the " BCI Battery Technical Manual : " report to their offering.

The author has recently updated its Technical Manual to include the most current SAE Standards as well as the Industrial Battery Standards. The manual is for all users of automobile type lead acid batteries and some

industrial batteries. Specific references to laboratory analyses and test methods for evaluation of battery performance, major component parts and raw materials used to manufacture these batteries are also included in the manual.

All the outlined test procedures were written by industry technical personnel who are members of the BCI Technical Committees. The manual provides a common means for manufacturers and their customers to describe and compare desired battery performance.

New also to the manual are the most current available SAE specifications, tests and procedures for batteries manufactured for Original Equipment (OE) purposes. The revisions are prepared by the SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) Storage Battery Subcommittee.

Key Topics Covered:

- Section 0: Introduction, Safety Chapter, and Safe Booster Cable Operation
- Section 1: BCI Method for Assignment of Group Numbers
- Section 2: BCI Recommended Test Procedures for Battery Materials
- Section 3a: BCI Recommended Battery Materials Specifications, Valve Regulated Recombinant Batteries
- Section 3b: BCI Recommended Materials Specifications, Battery Separator Test Methods
- Section 4: BCI Recommended Storage Battery Specifications for Starting, Lighting and Ignition Types
- Section 5: BCI Recommended Specifications for Electric Vehicle Batteries
- Section 6: BCI Recommended Specifications for Constant Current Cycle Life Testing of Deep Cycle Batteries
- Section 7: BCI Recommended Specification for Cycle Life Testing of Batteries for Golf Cars
- Section 8: BCI Recommended Specification for Cycle Life Testing of Deep Cycle Marine/RV Batteries
- Section 9: BCI Battery Flame Retardant Venting Systems
- Section 10: Recommended Practices for Warning Messages, General Labeling & Marking and Shipping & Packaging
- Section 11: BCI Recommended Standardized Testing Methods for Polypropylene Resin
- Section 12: BCI Recommended Test Procedures for Lead Oxides
- Section 13: BCI Specification Reference for Standby Batteries
- Section 14: BCI Determination of Capacity of Lead-Acid Industrial Storage Batteries for Motive Power Service
- Section 15: BCI Life Cycle Testing of Lead-Acid Storage Batteries for Motive Power Service
- Section 16: BCI Standard for Deep Cycle Battery Chargers
- Section 17: BCI Procedures for Evaluating Plastic Jars and Covers for Motive Power Industrial Batteries
- Section 18: BCI Standard for Deep Cycle Fast/Battery Chargers
- Section 19: SAE Test Methods.


- SAE J240 JUN1993 Life Test for Automotive Storage Batteries
- SAE J537 JUN94 Storage Batteries
- SAE J541 FEB89 Voltage Drop for Starting Motor Circuits
- SAE J930 AUG84 Storage Batteries for Off-Road Self-Propelled Work Machines
- SAE J539 MAR87 Voltages for Diesel Electrical Systems
- SAE J1495 MAR92 Test Procedure for Battery Flame Retardant Venting Systems
- SAE J2185 NOV 91 Life Test for Heavy-Duty Storage Batteries
- Section 20: BCI Recommended Procedures for Concentrated Sulfuric Acid for Use in Preparing Lead-Acid Battery Electrolyte


For more information visit www.researchandmarkets.com/research/9add3d/bci_battery_techni :

Research and MarketsLaura Wood, Senior Manager press@researchandmarkets.com : mailto:press@researchandmarkets.com U.S.

Fax: 646-607-1907Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction.



image

Congressman Upton: Jobs need to be focus of 2010 - WNDU

Posted: 26 Jan 2010 04:20 AM PST

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have a lot to tackle in 2010, and it's only January. From healthcare to education, there could be some big changes this year.

Michigan's 6th District Congressman Fred Upton says one of the things they must focus on is jobs.

"One in 10 jobs in America is dependant upon the auto industry," Upton said. "Now we've lost one in five manufacturing jobs over the last two years, almost half of those jobs have come just from Michigan and you could say northern Indiana as well particularly with the RV industry. It's important that we get this industry up and running again because it has a tremendous impact on all of the suppliers; the tool and die operations, the seat manufacturers."

Upton will at the Washington auto show Tuesday afternoon just like he was at the Detroit auto show earlier this month.

Meantime, President Obama delivers his first State of the Union address Wednesday night. Congressman Upton says he is happy with the president's decision to freeze spending for three years on parts of the federal budget.

"I'm going to support that. I have long been concerned about the deficit. This year I voted against a lot of appropriations bills, some of them with a pretty dramatic increase," Upton said. "This year if we can start off by saying it's going to be a freeze, zero percent increase, except for defense and veterans and homeland security, if we can freeze all this then I think that is a good step in the right direction and has a tremendous impact in the out years, two, three, four years from now."

Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction.



image

Cop car contract approved - Post-Tribune

Posted: 26 Jan 2010 02:12 AM PST


PORTAGE -- The Board of Works approved contracts Monday on a pair of items that are being paid for by federal grants.

And in at least one instance, the money is going further than first anticipated.

City Engineer Craig Hendrix said he will ask for federal approval to contact dealers about ordering more police cars over and above those that will be coming from Arnell Auto Group in Burns Harbor, the lowest of three bidders.

Arnell's bid of $20,799 per vehicle, totaling $395,197, was approved unanimously, subject to review by the city attorney and police inspection.

The city will pay for the cars out of its cumulative capital improvement fund and then be reimbursed for the entire amount out of $492,000 that is being made available from federal Congestion Management funds.

"The unused money will be used for more police cars," Hendrix said

He said one dealer in Kokomo and two in Illinois were contacted under grant rules that required the city to seek proposals from outside the immediate area.

Mayor Olga Velazquez said she hopes the cars can be delivered within 60 days. The city had scaled back its police car replacement schedule from 10 to eight a year because of budget constraints.

Taking care of one more piece of damage from the September 2008 storms, the board awarded the contract for repairing erosion and washed-out trees around the outfall of the city's wastewater treatment plant to low bidder RV Sutton of Chesterton for $34,700.

Hendrix offered no guesses about why the bids, all from area construction firms, ranged all the way up to $127,000, but he said the amount from Sutton and two others who were under $40,000 was because "they're hungry for work, and we're seeing the benefits."

Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction.



image

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar